PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-48.13%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
5.86%
Cost growth above 1.5x PR's 2.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-69.85%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-41.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
122.44%
G&A growth above 1.5x PR's 0.43%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.67%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 950.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
114.83%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PR's 7.12%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
42.36%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PR's 3.03%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
1.16%
Interest expense growth less than half of PR's 17.37%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
8.33%
D&A growth while PR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-90.23%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-87.62%
EBITDA margin decline while PR shows 177.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-116.77%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-132.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
54.86%
Other expenses growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-125.95%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-150.04%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-140.94%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-123.79%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-145.86%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-118.55%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-118.55%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
28.12%
Share count reduction below 50% of PR's 2.40%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
27.89%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PR's 2.40%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.