PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.35%
Revenue decline while PR shows 11.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
1.37%
Cost growth less than half of PR's 3.73%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-31.93%
Gross profit decline while PR shows 38.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-18.62%
Margin decline while PR shows 24.12% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-95.62%
G&A reduction while PR shows 8.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-64.76%
Operating expenses reduction while PR shows 20.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-27.57%
Total costs reduction while PR shows 6.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.02%
Interest expense reduction while PR shows 11.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.94%
D&A growth less than half of PR's 8.99%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-30.18%
EBITDA decline while PR shows 18.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
90.34%
EBITDA margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-108.89%
Operating income decline while PR shows 128.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-110.63%
Operating margin decline while PR shows 103.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
67.48%
Other expenses growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-135.42%
Pre-tax income decline while PR shows 548.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-142.34%
Pre-tax margin decline while PR shows 500.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-244.19%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-104.03%
Net income decline while PR shows 368.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-104.81%
Net margin decline while PR shows 339.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-104.13%
EPS decline while PR shows 322.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-104.05%
Diluted EPS decline while PR shows 322.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.85%
Share count reduction while PR shows 20.43% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.02%
Diluted share reduction while PR shows 20.43% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.