40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-72.53%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-14.74%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-106.81%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-124.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.71%
G&A growth while PR reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.29%
Other expenses growth less than half of PR's 101.89%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
11.72%
Operating expenses growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.48%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-10.42%
Interest expense reduction while PR shows 1.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.68%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-393.95%
EBITDA decline while PR shows 122.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-155.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-634.78%
Operating income decline while PR shows 84.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2046.87%
Operating margin decline while PR shows 67.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
84.85%
Other expenses growth less than half of PR's 485.19%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-828.88%
Pre-tax income decline while PR shows 100.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2753.47%
Pre-tax margin decline while PR shows 101.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
110.00%
Tax expense growth 1.1-1.25x PR's 97.70%. Bill Ackman would demand explanation.
-1141.09%
Net income decline while PR shows 100.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3890.09%
Net margin decline while PR shows 102.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1141.36%
EPS decline while PR shows 101.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1141.36%
Diluted EPS decline while PR shows 101.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.