40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-20.58%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
33.60%
Cost growth above 1.5x PR's 0.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-40.39%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.80%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.89%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-39.46%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-8.75%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
12.70%
Interest expense growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.93%
D&A growth above 1.5x PR's 3.39%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-27.33%
EBITDA decline while PR shows 3.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.67%
EBITDA margin decline while PR shows 1.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.75%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.37%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 118.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-44.77%
Pre-tax income decline while PR shows 6.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.47%
Pre-tax margin decline while PR shows 31.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
156.00%
Tax expense growth while PR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-63.52%
Net income decline while PR shows 10.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-54.07%
Net margin decline while PR shows 36.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-63.08%
EPS decline while PR shows 7.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-62.83%
Diluted EPS decline while PR shows 8.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.29%
Share count reduction while PR shows 2.57% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.63%
Diluted share reduction while PR shows 1.94% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.