40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.92%
Positive growth while RRC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.48%
Cost increase while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
1.42%
Gross profit growth below 50% of RRC's 2.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.46%
Margin decline while RRC shows 3.11% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.40%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of RRC's 2.13%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
2.81%
Operating expenses growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.86%
Total costs growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.47%
D&A reduction while RRC shows 2.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-6.50%
EBITDA decline while RRC shows 8.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
27.50%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 5.03%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.43%
Operating income decline while RRC shows 18.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.26%
Operating margin decline while RRC shows 19.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-434.26%
Other expenses reduction while RRC shows 20.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-50.42%
Pre-tax income decline while RRC shows 81.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.83%
Pre-tax margin decline while RRC shows 82.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.67%
Tax expense reduction while RRC shows 101.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-57.44%
Net income decline while RRC shows 26.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.65%
Net margin decline while RRC shows 26.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.54%
EPS decline while RRC shows 10.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.75%
Diluted EPS decline while RRC shows 10.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.43%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x RRC's 11.31%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
2.60%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x RRC's 11.31%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.