40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
20.48%
Positive growth while RRC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
13.44%
Similar cost growth to RRC's 15.25%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
27.46%
Positive growth while RRC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.79%
Margin expansion while RRC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.54%
Other expenses growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
23.04%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x RRC's 8.16%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
16.99%
Total costs growth above 1.5x RRC's 10.76%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.52%
D&A growth while RRC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
39.39%
EBITDA growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.29%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
41.97%
Operating income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.83%
Operating margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.32%
Other expenses growth less than half of RRC's 61.34%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
95.96%
Pre-tax income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
62.65%
Pre-tax margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
72.82%
Tax expense growth less than half of RRC's 4760.87%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
115.34%
Net income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
78.73%
Net margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.82%
EPS growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.88%
Diluted EPS growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
58.62%
Share count increase while RRC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
56.84%
Diluted share increase while RRC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.