40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.20%
Revenue decline while RRC shows 10.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-23.01%
Cost reduction while RRC shows 11.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
21.97%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 10.72%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
23.45%
Margin expansion while RRC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.11%
Other expenses growth less than half of RRC's 25.90%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-0.35%
Operating expenses reduction while RRC shows 21.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-15.95%
Total costs reduction while RRC shows 17.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.13%
D&A reduction while RRC shows 2.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
22.28%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 1.54%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-17.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
42.63%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 1.05%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
44.36%
Operating margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
80.01%
Other expenses growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
672.11%
Pre-tax income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
679.03%
Pre-tax margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
556.64%
Tax expense growth while RRC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
1968.89%
Net income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1991.52%
Net margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2385.71%
EPS change of 2385.71% while RRC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
2450.00%
Diluted EPS growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-19.18%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-18.90%
Diluted share reduction while RRC shows 4.24% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.