40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.15%
Revenue growth 50-75% of RRC's 19.33%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
16.28%
Cost increase while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
9.37%
Gross profit growth below 50% of RRC's 27.72%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.47%
Margin decline while RRC shows 7.04% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.25%
Other expenses growth less than half of RRC's 10.37%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
19.00%
Operating expenses growth less than half of RRC's 40.16%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
17.29%
Similar total costs growth to RRC's 22.48%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.85%
D&A reduction while RRC shows 7.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-38.64%
EBITDA decline while RRC shows 12.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
16.43%
EBITDA margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.15%
Operating income growth below 50% of RRC's 13.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
96.83%
Other expenses growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-63.39%
Pre-tax income decline while RRC shows 13.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-67.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.53%
Tax expense reduction while RRC shows 14.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-68.39%
Net income decline while RRC shows 13.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-71.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-67.71%
EPS decline while RRC shows 5.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-68.09%
Diluted EPS decline while RRC shows 11.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.94%
Share count reduction while RRC shows 7.88% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.81%
Diluted share reduction while RRC shows 1.88% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
