40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
39.61%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 14.08%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-57.78%
Cost reduction while RRC shows 39.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
104.36%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 8.91%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
46.38%
Margin expansion while RRC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.66%
Other expenses growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
157.95%
Operating expenses growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.11%
Total costs growth above 1.5x RRC's 2.78%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.52%
D&A growth above 1.5x RRC's 0.45%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
53.25%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 18.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
319.57%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 26.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
79.08%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 11.26%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
28.27%
Operating margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-109.18%
Other expenses reduction while RRC shows 49.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-17.34%
Pre-tax income decline while RRC shows 30.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.80%
Pre-tax margin decline while RRC shows 14.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.50%
Tax expense reduction while RRC shows 29.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-37.63%
Net income decline while RRC shows 29.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-55.33%
Net margin decline while RRC shows 13.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.99%
EPS decline while RRC shows 30.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.67%
Diluted EPS decline while RRC shows 24.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.33%
Share count reduction while RRC shows 0.50% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
1.66%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x RRC's 5.41%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.