40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.30%
Revenue growth below 50% of RRC's 12.59%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
22.46%
Similar cost growth to RRC's 29.06%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
-17.94%
Gross profit decline while RRC shows 9.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-20.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.32%
Other expenses growth less than half of RRC's 18.59%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
11.03%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x RRC's 5.02%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
19.27%
Total costs growth above 1.5x RRC's 11.43%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.05%
D&A growth less than half of RRC's 25.26%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-20.43%
EBITDA decline while RRC shows 18.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-31.87%
EBITDA margin decline while RRC shows 44.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.26%
Operating income decline while RRC shows 14.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-42.17%
Operating margin decline while RRC shows 1.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
154.55%
Other expenses growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-27.82%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-106.94%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
15.45%
Net income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.76%
Net margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.59%
EPS growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.59%
Diluted EPS growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.73%
Diluted share reduction while RRC shows 14.18% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.