40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.78%
Positive growth while RRC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
14.97%
Similar cost growth to RRC's 14.43%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
12.45%
Positive growth while RRC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.17%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.94%
Similar other expenses growth to RRC's 9.49%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
13.17%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x RRC's 1.27%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.47%
Total costs growth above 1.5x RRC's 5.04%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.11%
D&A growth 50-75% of RRC's 8.48%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
9.73%
EBITDA growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-33.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
12.10%
Operating income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
92.83%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x RRC's 3.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
379.91%
Pre-tax income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
321.78%
Pre-tax margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
107.84%
Tax expense growth while RRC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
1213.67%
Net income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1054.55%
Net margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1258.33%
EPS growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1258.33%
Diluted EPS growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.45%
Share count reduction while RRC shows 1.77% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.76%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.