40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
65.08%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 0.95%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
8.18%
Cost growth 50-75% of RRC's 11.92%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
113.05%
Positive growth while RRC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
29.06%
Margin expansion while RRC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.71%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.41%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-38.80%
Operating expenses reduction while RRC shows 13.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-21.83%
Total costs reduction while RRC shows 13.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.26%
Interest expense reduction while RRC shows 9.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.49%
D&A reduction while RRC shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
276.02%
EBITDA growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
154.85%
EBITDA margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
348.34%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 146.22%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
250.44%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 143.89%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
9.09%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of RRC's 13.53%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
257.60%
Pre-tax income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
195.47%
Pre-tax margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1067.86%
Tax expense growth while RRC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
220.00%
Net income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
172.69%
Net margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
219.88%
EPS growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
216.96%
Diluted EPS growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.18%
Share count reduction while RRC shows 0.18% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.03%
Diluted share increase while RRC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.