40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.48%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 7.43%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-5.64%
Cost reduction while RRC shows 3.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
32.96%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 8.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
12.22%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x RRC's 0.68%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.82%
G&A reduction while RRC shows 33.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.43%
Other expenses reduction while RRC shows 23.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-9.30%
Operating expenses reduction while RRC shows 26.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.75%
Total costs reduction while RRC shows 21.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.94%
Interest expense reduction while RRC shows 8.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.87%
D&A growth less than half of RRC's 68.98%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-1.82%
EBITDA decline while RRC shows 18.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
25.23%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 14.19%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-5.94%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
483.54%
Other expenses growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
48.20%
Pre-tax income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.09%
Pre-tax margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
332.43%
Tax expense growth while RRC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-31.82%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-32.50%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.93%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.