40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.59%
Revenue growth below 50% of RRC's 55.68%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-1.14%
Cost reduction while RRC shows 310.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
7.03%
Gross profit growth below 50% of RRC's 15.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.33%
Margin expansion while RRC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while RRC shows 16.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.15%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x RRC's 9.75%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
26.54%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x RRC's 11.59%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.60%
Total costs growth less than half of RRC's 69.18%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
18.45%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x RRC's 1.54%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
1.03%
D&A growth while RRC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-50.89%
EBITDA decline while RRC shows 68.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-152.91%
Operating income decline while RRC shows 22.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-150.59%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-202.97%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-304.37%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-295.40%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-303.49%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-305.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-296.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-306.17%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-306.17%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.18%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.