40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-26.90%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-6.19%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-35.05%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.15%
Margin decline while RRC shows 2.15% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.88%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-40.07%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-27.46%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.82%
Interest expense growth less than half of RRC's 7.19%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-33.37%
D&A reduction while RRC shows 3.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
77.15%
EBITDA growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.32%
EBITDA margin decline while RRC shows 5.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
507.34%
Operating income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
657.23%
Operating margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
93.91%
Other expenses growth 1.25-1.5x RRC's 72.22%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize cost items.
200.95%
Pre-tax income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
238.10%
Pre-tax margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
336.00%
Tax expense growth while RRC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
104.88%
Net income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
106.67%
Net margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
105.99%
EPS growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
105.99%
Diluted EPS growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
