40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-59.37%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-12.27%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-86.14%
Gross profit decline while RRC shows 4.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-65.88%
Margin decline while RRC shows 9.42% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.86%
G&A reduction while RRC shows 72.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.30%
Other expenses reduction while RRC shows 2.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-17.50%
Operating expenses reduction while RRC shows 16.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.98%
Total costs reduction while RRC shows 0.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.76%
Interest expense growth 50-75% of RRC's 15.27%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-19.59%
D&A reduction while RRC shows 8.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-349.47%
EBITDA decline while RRC shows 263.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-87.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-763.74%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1733.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1121.05%
Other expenses reduction while RRC shows 277.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-848.00%
Pre-tax income decline while RRC shows 235.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1940.84%
Pre-tax margin decline while RRC shows 242.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-510.90%
Tax expense reduction while RRC shows 240.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12450.00%
Net income decline while RRC shows 233.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30493.50%
Net margin decline while RRC shows 239.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10160.00%
EPS decline while RRC shows 230.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10160.00%
Diluted EPS decline while RRC shows 230.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.