40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-51.66%
Revenue decline while RRC shows 8.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.04%
Cost reduction while RRC shows 4.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-93.69%
Gross profit decline while RRC shows 8.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-86.94%
Margin decline while RRC shows 15.13% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.36%
G&A reduction while RRC shows 13.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-127.59%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-14.04%
Operating expenses reduction while RRC shows 15.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.41%
Total costs reduction while RRC shows 6.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.88%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x RRC's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-11.88%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-131.33%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-226.72%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-575.87%
Operating margin decline while RRC shows 6.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-142.98%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-57.06%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-224.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.15%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-58.58%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-228.04%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-57.78%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-58.74%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.51%
Share count increase while RRC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.