40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-20.50%
Revenue decline while RRC shows 1.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
7.33%
Cost growth above 1.5x RRC's 4.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-37.39%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.91%
G&A growth above 1.5x RRC's 3.02%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.26%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
20.68%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x RRC's 14.89%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
13.52%
Total costs growth above 1.5x RRC's 5.62%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
27.85%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x RRC's 2.61%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
8.81%
D&A growth less than half of RRC's 52.41%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
60.69%
EBITDA growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-213.10%
EBITDA margin decline while RRC shows 22.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.25%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-101.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8666.67%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x RRC's 100.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
59.63%
Pre-tax income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.79%
Pre-tax margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5800.00%
Tax expense growth while RRC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
11.72%
Net margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.76%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.76%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.01%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x RRC's 0.03%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.01%
Diluted share increase while RRC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.