40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
40.53%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 14.61%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
13.44%
Cost growth above 1.5x RRC's 0.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
68.72%
Similar gross profit growth to RRC's 71.76%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
20.06%
Margin expansion below 50% of RRC's 49.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.18%
G&A growth less than half of RRC's 52.51%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-136.36%
Other expenses reduction while RRC shows 52.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
5.63%
Operating expenses growth less than half of RRC's 17.12%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
9.60%
Total costs growth above 1.5x RRC's 3.16%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-5.94%
Interest expense reduction while RRC shows 4.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
15.71%
D&A growth while RRC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-39.19%
EBITDA decline while RRC shows 357.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
190.42%
EBITDA margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6650.00%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 191.70%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4760.79%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 154.52%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-121.86%
Other expenses reduction while RRC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-71.84%
Pre-tax income decline while RRC shows 35.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-79.96%
Pre-tax margin decline while RRC shows 44.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
64.91%
Tax expense growth while RRC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-177.89%
Net income decline while RRC shows 273.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-155.43%
Net margin decline while RRC shows 251.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-178.67%
EPS decline while RRC shows 271.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-178.67%
Diluted EPS decline while RRC shows 271.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.04%
Share count reduction while RRC shows 0.02% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.