40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-25.13%
Revenue decline while RRC shows 0.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
1.04%
Cost growth less than half of RRC's 13.39%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-45.65%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.50%
G&A growth while RRC reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13800.00%
Other expenses growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.32%
Operating expenses growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.60%
Total costs growth above 1.5x RRC's 8.16%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-11.96%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
9.09%
D&A growth above 1.5x RRC's 3.98%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-72.90%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-134.42%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-145.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
40.68%
Other expenses growth less than half of RRC's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-238.13%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-284.49%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-877.78%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-200.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-233.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-200.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-198.75%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.86%
Share count reduction while RRC shows 0.07% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.18%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.