40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
88.67%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 14.91%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
1.04%
Cost growth less than half of RRC's 15.20%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
189.76%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 14.09%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
53.58%
Margin expansion while RRC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.18%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-200.00%
Other expenses reduction while RRC shows 8204.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-26.34%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-10.15%
Total costs reduction while RRC shows 13.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.52%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.29%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
259.24%
EBITDA growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
111.54%
EBITDA margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1037.82%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 13.30%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
503.08%
Operating margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-136.49%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
2520.00%
Pre-tax income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1288.68%
Pre-tax margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2383.33%
Tax expense growth while RRC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
2541.03%
Net income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1299.82%
Net margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2595.00%
EPS growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2595.00%
Diluted EPS growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.18%
Share count reduction while RRC shows 0.04% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.