40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-48.13%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
5.86%
Cost increase while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-69.85%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-41.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
122.44%
G&A growth above 1.5x RRC's 26.68%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
114.83%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x RRC's 15.54%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
42.36%
Total costs growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.16%
Interest expense growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.33%
D&A growth while RRC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-90.23%
EBITDA decline while RRC shows 116.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-87.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-116.77%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-132.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
54.86%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of RRC's 93.59%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-125.95%
Pre-tax income decline while RRC shows 100.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-150.04%
Pre-tax margin decline while RRC shows 100.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-140.94%
Tax expense reduction while RRC shows 108.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-123.79%
Net income decline while RRC shows 100.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-145.86%
Net margin decline while RRC shows 100.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-118.55%
EPS decline while RRC shows 100.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-118.55%
Diluted EPS decline while RRC shows 100.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
28.12%
Share count reduction below 50% of RRC's 0.50%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
27.89%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of RRC's 1.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
