PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.94%
Revenue decline while RRC shows 0.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
14.92%
Cost growth above 1.5x RRC's 2.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-33.60%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.45%
G&A growth 1.1-1.25x RRC's 6.81%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of necessary spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.11%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
14.90%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x RRC's 4.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.91%
Total costs growth above 1.5x RRC's 3.07%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
13.79%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x RRC's 0.69%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
0.96%
D&A growth 50-75% of RRC's 1.52%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
-60.49%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-162.05%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-167.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-35.48%
Other expenses reduction while RRC shows 65.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-254.14%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-267.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
160.23%
Tax expense growth while RRC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-166.34%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-172.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-166.39%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-168.10%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.23%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.84%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.