40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.73%
Revenue growth below 50% of RRC's 39.52%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
1.43%
Cost growth less than half of RRC's 11.09%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
14.09%
Gross profit growth below 50% of RRC's 102.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.90%
Margin expansion below 50% of RRC's 44.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.01%
G&A reduction while RRC shows 2.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.29%
Other expenses reduction while RRC shows 3.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-3.13%
Operating expenses reduction while RRC shows 4.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.28%
Total costs reduction while RRC shows 10.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-22.22%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-4.73%
D&A reduction while RRC shows 2.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
45.97%
EBITDA growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.64%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of RRC's 42.87%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
104.96%
Similar operating income growth to RRC's 123.80%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
104.69%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 60.41%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
8.33%
Other expenses growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
65.37%
Pre-tax income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
67.24%
Pre-tax margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-99.06%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
64.88%
Net income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
66.78%
Net margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
64.56%
EPS growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
64.56%
Diluted EPS growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.91%
Share count reduction while RRC shows 0.81% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.