40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.64%
Revenue growth below 50% of RRC's 26.89%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
3.30%
Cost growth 50-75% of RRC's 4.57%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
13.14%
Gross profit growth below 50% of RRC's 76.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.15%
Margin expansion below 50% of RRC's 38.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.19%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.52%
Other expenses growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.84%
Operating expenses growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.81%
Total costs growth above 1.5x RRC's 2.89%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-8.49%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.68%
D&A growth while RRC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-36.58%
EBITDA decline while RRC shows 23.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4550.00%
Operating income decline while RRC shows 112.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4196.17%
Operating margin decline while RRC shows 67.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.97%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-91.09%
Pre-tax income decline while RRC shows 71.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.90%
Pre-tax margin decline while RRC shows 35.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.07%
Tax expense growth less than half of RRC's 141.15%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-165.00%
Net income decline while RRC shows 2.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-143.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-165.22%
EPS decline while RRC shows 2.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-177.27%
Diluted EPS decline while RRC shows 2.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.59%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.04%
Diluted share increase while RRC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.