40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.48%
Positive growth while VET shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-5.64%
Cost reduction while VET shows 6.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
32.96%
Positive growth while VET shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
12.22%
Margin expansion while VET shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.82%
G&A reduction while VET shows 5.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.43%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-9.30%
Operating expenses reduction while VET shows 3.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.75%
Total costs reduction while VET shows 4.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.94%
Interest expense reduction while VET shows 1.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.87%
D&A growth 1.1-1.25x VET's 1.57%. Bill Ackman would demand investment justification.
-1.82%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
25.23%
EBITDA margin growth while VET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.94%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
483.54%
Other expenses growth while VET reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
48.20%
Pre-tax income growth while VET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.09%
Pre-tax margin growth while VET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
332.43%
Tax expense growth while VET reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-31.82%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-32.50%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.93%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
