40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-29.84%
Revenue decline while VET shows 4.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-7.13%
Cost reduction while VET shows 3.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-38.48%
Gross profit decline while VET shows 5.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-12.32%
Margin decline while VET shows 0.55% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.11%
G&A growth 1.1-1.25x VET's 9.31%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of necessary spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.18%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x VET's 1.27%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
0.08%
Total costs growth less than half of VET's 2.48%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
1.42%
Interest expense growth less than half of VET's 8.28%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-1.52%
D&A reduction while VET shows 0.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-43.56%
EBITDA decline while VET shows 2.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.40%
EBITDA margin decline while VET shows 0.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.06%
Operating income decline while VET shows 8.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-64.46%
Operating margin decline while VET shows 3.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
80.92%
Other expenses growth while VET reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-71.40%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-59.24%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
79.92%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x VET's 5.94%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-74.25%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-63.29%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-74.75%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-74.75%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.30%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x VET's 0.64%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.30%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of VET's 0.53%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
