40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
32.96%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x VET's 17.25%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
23.09%
Similar cost growth to VET's 21.88%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
39.42%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x VET's 15.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.86%
Margin expansion while VET shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.91%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.00%
Similar other expenses growth to VET's 83.33%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-15.26%
Operating expenses reduction while VET shows 5.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.51%
Total costs growth less than half of VET's 13.86%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.76%
Interest expense growth less than half of VET's 14.04%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
7.73%
D&A growth less than half of VET's 18.83%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
155.04%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x VET's 33.96%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
98.85%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x VET's 3.40%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
855.56%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x VET's 16.58%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
618.69%
Operating margin growth while VET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.86%
Other expenses growth while VET reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
157.83%
Pre-tax income growth while VET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
143.50%
Pre-tax margin growth while VET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1300.00%
Tax expense growth while VET reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
146.22%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x VET's 1.26%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
134.76%
Net margin growth while VET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
147.06%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x VET's 1.01%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
147.06%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x VET's 2.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.37%
Share count change of 0.37% while VET is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.37%
Diluted share change of 0.37% while VET is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
