PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-44.59%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-27.34%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-54.72%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.48%
G&A reduction while VET shows 2.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.41%
Other expenses growth less than half of VET's 5944.57%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
1.32%
Operating expenses growth while VET reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-15.29%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-50.40%
Interest expense reduction while VET shows 2.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.33%
D&A growth while VET reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
153.87%
EBITDA growth while VET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
358.14%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x VET's 8.35%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-96.32%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-93.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-420.16%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-892.24%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1529.71%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-791.24%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-962.12%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1655.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-940.30%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-940.30%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.25%
Share count change of 2.25% while VET is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
2.25%
Diluted share change of 2.25% while VET is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.