40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.01%
Revenue decline while VET shows 13.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.13%
Cost reduction while VET shows 3.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.20%
Gross profit decline while VET shows 18.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.95%
Margin expansion 50-75% of VET's 4.23%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.78%
G&A growth while VET reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
352.54%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x VET's 154.37%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
13.26%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x VET's 5.03%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-1.98%
Total costs reduction while VET shows 3.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.79%
Interest expense reduction while VET shows 16.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.24%
D&A growth while VET reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-7.28%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.18%
EBITDA margin decline while VET shows 2.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.43%
Operating income decline while VET shows 24.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.66%
Operating margin decline while VET shows 9.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.32%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-10.41%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
35.38%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x VET's 3.79%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-12.60%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.98%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.13%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.83%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.69%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.