PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.85%
Revenue decline while VET shows 2.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-7.06%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-4.81%
Gross profit decline while VET shows 12.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.11%
Margin expansion below 50% of VET's 10.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.67%
G&A growth 50-75% of VET's 23.90%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.91%
Other expenses growth while VET reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
64.58%
Operating expenses growth while VET reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.65%
Total costs growth while VET reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.91%
Interest expense growth less than half of VET's 13.11%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-10.52%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-55.95%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-53.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-99.62%
Operating income decline while VET shows 52.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-99.60%
Operating margin decline while VET shows 49.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-432.26%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-118.10%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-119.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-180.39%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-111.83%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-112.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-111.92%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-111.46%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.95%
Share count change of 0.95% while VET is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-1.40%
Diluted share reduction while VET shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.