40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.35%
Revenue decline while VTLE shows 12.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
1.37%
Cost growth less than half of VTLE's 13.05%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-31.93%
Gross profit decline while VTLE shows 12.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-18.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-95.62%
G&A reduction while VTLE shows 50.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-64.76%
Operating expenses reduction while VTLE shows 58.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-27.57%
Total costs reduction while VTLE shows 18.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.02%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
2.94%
D&A growth above 1.5x VTLE's 0.63%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-30.18%
EBITDA decline while VTLE shows 13.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
90.34%
EBITDA margin growth while VTLE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-108.89%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-110.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
67.48%
Other expenses growth while VTLE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-135.42%
Pre-tax income decline while VTLE shows 8.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-142.34%
Pre-tax margin decline while VTLE shows 19.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-244.19%
Tax expense reduction while VTLE shows 28.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-104.03%
Net income decline while VTLE shows 8.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-104.81%
Net margin decline while VTLE shows 18.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-104.13%
EPS decline while VTLE shows 8.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-104.05%
Diluted EPS decline while VTLE shows 8.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.85%
Share count reduction while VTLE shows 0.08% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.02%
Diluted share reduction while VTLE shows 0.07% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.