40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.64%
Positive growth while VTLE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.30%
Cost increase while VTLE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
13.14%
Gross profit growth below 50% of VTLE's 206.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.15%
Margin expansion below 50% of VTLE's 219.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.19%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.52%
Other expenses growth while VTLE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.84%
Operating expenses growth while VTLE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.81%
Total costs growth while VTLE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.49%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.68%
D&A growth while VTLE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-36.58%
EBITDA decline while VTLE shows 162.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.62%
EBITDA margin decline while VTLE shows 165.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4550.00%
Operating income decline while VTLE shows 96.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4196.17%
Operating margin decline while VTLE shows 96.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.97%
Other expenses reduction while VTLE shows 93.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-91.09%
Pre-tax income decline while VTLE shows 95.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.90%
Pre-tax margin decline while VTLE shows 95.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.07%
Tax expense growth less than half of VTLE's 101.02%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-165.00%
Net income decline while VTLE shows 94.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-143.93%
Net margin decline while VTLE shows 94.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-165.22%
EPS decline while VTLE shows 90.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-177.27%
Diluted EPS decline while VTLE shows 90.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.59%
Share count reduction while VTLE shows 2.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.04%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x VTLE's 2.32%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.