40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-21.42%
Revenue decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-6.38%
Cost reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-28.98%
Gross profit decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-9.62%
Margin decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.63%
G&A reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-933.33%
Other expenses reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-14.46%
Operating expenses reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-10.98%
Total costs reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
0.95%
Interest expense change of 0.95% versus flat Energy costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-21.59%
D&A reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-217.47%
EBITDA decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-26.44%
EBITDA margin decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-57.88%
Operating income decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-46.40%
Operating margin decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
45.17%
Other expenses change of 45.17% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify control.
46.64%
Pre-tax income growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
32.10%
Margin change of 32.10% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
38.66%
Tax expense change of 38.66% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
50.49%
Net income growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
36.99%
Margin change of 36.99% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
50.61%
EPS change of 50.61% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
50.48%
Diluted EPS change of 50.48% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
0.27%
Share count change of 0.27% versus stable Energy. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.