40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
68.88%
Positive growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages in a declining market.
10.94%
Cost increase while Energy shows cost reduction. Peter Lynch would examine competitive disadvantages.
144.69%
Positive growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
44.89%
Margin expansion while Energy median declines. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2038.10%
G&A change of 2038.10% versus flat Energy overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1300.00%
Other expenses change of 1300.00% versus flat Energy costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
159.58%
Operating expenses growth while Energy reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
42.59%
Total costs growth while Energy reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-1.03%
Interest expense reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-4.81%
D&A reduction while Energy median is -0.68%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
101.86%
EBITDA growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-17.51%
EBITDA margin decline while Energy median is -1.35%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
2810.71%
Operating income growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
1705.10%
Operating margin growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-395.00%
Other expenses reduction while Energy median is -17.10%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
925.00%
Pre-tax income growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
588.51%
Pre-tax margin growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
325.81%
Tax expense growth while Energy reduces burden. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
7116.67%
Net income growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
4254.78%
Net margin growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
7112.99%
EPS growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
7236.56%
Diluted EPS growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
0.04%
Share count change of 0.04% versus stable Energy. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
-1.80%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.