40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.97%
Growth of 4.97% versus flat Energy revenue. Walter Schloss would verify growth quality.
-31.27%
Cost reduction while Energy median is -0.92%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
92.74%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 1.91%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
83.61%
Margin change of 83.61% versus flat Energy margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.49%
G&A reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
828.09%
Other expenses change of 828.09% versus flat Energy costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
333.73%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 8.81%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
3.69%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x Energy median of 2.71%. Guy Spier would scrutinize spending.
-1.90%
Interest expense reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
2.57%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.59%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
9.09%
EBITDA growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
12.71%
Margin change of 12.71% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
9.56%
Operating income growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
4.38%
Operating margin growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
134.44%
Other expenses change of 134.44% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify control.
19.74%
Pre-tax income growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
14.07%
Pre-tax margin growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-59.52%
Tax expense reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
49.12%
Net income growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
42.06%
Net margin growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
50.78%
EPS growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
51.18%
Diluted EPS growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-1.54%
Share count reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-1.53%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.