PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
0.74
Similar to PR's ratio of 0.78. Walter Schloss would see both operating with a similar safety margin.
0.74
Similar ratio to PR's 0.78. Walter Schloss might see both running close to industry norms.
0.17
0.5–0.75x PR's 0.33. Martin Whitman would question if short-term obligations are too high relative to cash.
-2.61
Negative interest coverage while PR shows 0.53. Joel Greenblatt would look for earnings improvements and debt restructuring catalysts.
1.06
Short-term coverage of 1.06 while PR has zero coverage. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if our cash flow management provides advantages.