PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
0.61
0.75–0.9x PR's 0.77. Bill Ackman might push for more working capital or better cash management.
0.61
Similar ratio to PR's 0.60. Walter Schloss might see both running close to industry norms.
0.00
Below 0.5x PR's 0.10. Michael Burry could foresee potential liquidity shocks if times get tough.
18.48
Coverage above 1.5x PR's 8.60. David Dodd would confirm minimal interest risk in contrast to competitor.
2.23
Short-term coverage of 2.23 while PR has zero coverage. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if our cash flow management provides advantages.