40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
1.00
Similar to VET's ratio of 1.02. Walter Schloss would see both operating with a similar safety margin.
0.96
Similar ratio to VET's 0.99. Walter Schloss might see both running close to industry norms.
0.11
0.5–0.75x VET's 0.16. Martin Whitman would question if short-term obligations are too high relative to cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.58
Short-term coverage of 6.58 while VET has zero coverage. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if our cash flow management provides advantages.