40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
1.75
Current Ratio > 1.5x VET's 0.89. David Dodd would confirm if this surplus liquidity is put to good use.
1.75
Quick Ratio > 1.5x VET's 0.86. David Dodd would verify if the company can handle unexpected shortfalls much better.
0.26
0.5–0.75x VET's 0.45. Martin Whitman would question if short-term obligations are too high relative to cash.
-0.89
Negative interest coverage while VET shows 18.23. Joel Greenblatt would look for earnings improvements and debt restructuring catalysts.
2.26
Short-term coverage of 2.26 while VET has zero coverage. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if our cash flow management provides advantages.