40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
0.45
Below 0.5x VET's 0.90. Michael Burry might see potential near-term liquidity strain.
0.45
0.5–0.75x VET's 0.86. Martin Whitman might be concerned about coverage if a crisis hits.
0.00
Positive cash ratio while VET shows negative ratio. John Neff would examine our cash position advantages in a challenging market.
4.77
Similar coverage to VET's 4.45. Walter Schloss might see both equally equipped to handle interest costs.
1.28
Short-term coverage of 1.28 while VET has zero coverage. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if our cash flow management provides advantages.