40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-0.33%
Negative ROE while CRK stands at 4.17%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-0.14%
Negative ROA while CRK stands at 1.60%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
3.34%
Similar ROCE to CRK's 3.54%. Walter Schloss would see if both firms share operational best practices.
48.50%
Gross margin 50-75% of CRK's 78.13%. Martin Whitman would worry about a persistent competitive disadvantage.
25.19%
Operating margin 50-75% of CRK's 47.28%. Martin Whitman would question competitiveness or cost discipline.
-1.24%
Negative net margin while CRK has 22.76%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.