40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-4.59%
Negative ROE while EQT stands at 2.62%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-1.92%
Negative ROA while EQT stands at 2.29%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-0.41%
Negative ROCE while EQT is at 6.52%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
45.62%
Similar gross margin to EQT's 48.83%. Walter Schloss would check if both companies have comparable cost structures.
-6.57%
Negative operating margin while EQT has 41.36%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-34.18%
Negative net margin while EQT has 15.38%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.