40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-34.95%
Negative ROE while EQT stands at 3.05%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-10.03%
Negative ROA while EQT stands at 2.32%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-11.23%
Negative ROCE while EQT is at 5.27%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
34.87%
Gross margin 1.25-1.5x EQT's 29.83%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if this advantage is sustainable.
-126.55%
Negative operating margin while EQT has 29.67%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-127.82%
Negative net margin while EQT has 13.71%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.