40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
2.96%
Positive ROE while VET is negative. John Neff would see if this signals a clear edge over the competitor.
0.42%
Positive ROA while VET shows negative. Mohnish Pabrai might see this as a clear operational edge.
0.72%
Similar ROCE to VET's 0.71%. Walter Schloss would see if both firms share operational best practices.
90.55%
Gross margin above 1.5x VET's 52.68%. David Dodd would assess whether superior technology or brand is driving this.
22.04%
Operating margin above 1.5x VET's 9.22%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s operations are uniquely productive.
13.24%
Positive net margin while VET is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage vs. the competitor.