40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
3.14%
Similar ROE to VET's 3.18%. Walter Schloss would examine if both firms share comparable business models.
1.47%
Similar ROA to VET's 1.46%. Peter Lynch might expect similar cost structures or operational dynamics.
1.68%
ROCE below 50% of VET's 4.71%. Michael Burry would question the viability of the firm’s strategy.
53.55%
Gross margin 50-75% of VET's 80.70%. Martin Whitman would worry about a persistent competitive disadvantage.
14.69%
Operating margin below 50% of VET's 44.49%. Michael Burry would investigate whether this signals deeper issues.
13.94%
Net margin 75-90% of VET's 15.70%. Bill Ackman would want a plan to match the competitor’s bottom line.