40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-3.01%
Negative ROE while VET stands at 4.70%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-1.54%
Negative ROA while VET stands at 2.34%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-1.29%
Negative ROCE while VET is at 2.16%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
54.25%
Gross margin 75-90% of VET's 68.92%. Bill Ackman would ask if incremental improvements can close the gap.
-26.62%
Negative operating margin while VET has 24.66%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-34.38%
Negative net margin while VET has 29.38%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.