40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-9.17%
Negative ROE while VET stands at 3.62%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-2.39%
Negative ROA while VET stands at 1.63%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-0.97%
Negative ROCE while VET is at 4.22%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
50.71%
Gross margin 50-75% of VET's 68.59%. Martin Whitman would worry about a persistent competitive disadvantage.
-14.16%
Negative operating margin while VET has 38.29%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-40.70%
Negative net margin while VET has 16.84%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.