40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-17.94%
Negative ROE while VET stands at 0.07%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-7.48%
Negative ROA while VET stands at 0.03%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
0.15%
Positive ROCE while VET is negative. John Neff would see if competitive strategy explains the difference.
51.48%
Gross margin 1.25-1.5x VET's 45.18%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if this advantage is sustainable.
2.40%
Positive operating margin while VET is negative. John Neff might see a significant competitive edge in operations.
-136.67%
Negative net margin while VET has 0.65%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.