40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-3.40%
Negative ROE while VET stands at 0.56%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-1.50%
Negative ROA while VET stands at 0.22%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
1.93%
ROCE 1.25-1.5x VET's 1.34%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm’s capital structure drives superior returns.
58.84%
Gross margin 1.25-1.5x VET's 51.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if this advantage is sustainable.
21.65%
Operating margin 1.25-1.5x VET's 15.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate if management’s strategy yields a cost advantage.
-18.93%
Negative net margin while VET has 2.72%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.